Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(4)
The work has been extended by Razak et al. [7, 8, 12]; however, significant gap exists between analytical and simulated results.
Figure 1 Comparison between analytical and simulated PDF for U 1. Following similar rationale, we now find the CDF and PDF of U2.
We first developed both the models (proposed and model in [1]) in Matlab, compared their analytical results, and then simulate the same scenario in Opnet Modeler and made comparison between analytical and simulated throughput.
The simulated results are very accurate for the first MT that is detected, with a slight difference between analytical and simulated results, although this difference is always below 1 dB and most of the time even lower, proving right accuracy for our analytical approach.
Similar(56)
The accuracy of our analysis is attested by Monte Carlo simulations, in which a perfect agreement between the analytical and simulated curves is observed.
Importantly, in all tested scenarios, there is very close agreement between the analytical and simulated curves.
We verify the model using the pseudopotential Lattice Boltzmann model and obtain good agreement between the analytical and simulated pressures.
Figure 24 shows analytical and simulated throughput.
Fig. 8 Analytical and simulated AoF for L-branch EGC receiver.
This paper presents the analytical and simulated results to test the validity of the analysis and the relationship between the dimming and communication performance in the line-of-sight (LOS) and diffuse channel cases.
Figure 5 shows the analytical and simulated BER performance in the diffuse channel case.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com