Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
As such, there was no statistically significant difference between all study patients and those who completed the study (p > 0.05).
Similar(59)
Profiles of participating physicians and practices were created to allow comparison between study patients; all patients of study physicians(to assess bias introduced by recruitment method for patients); and a larger sample of all patients of FHTs in comparable locations (All Ontario FHT patients with the exception of those in Toronto and rural areas).
†Statistically significant differences between percentages of study patients and all US MDR TB patients at p<0.05.
a P <0.001, comparison between the study patients and the age- and sex-matched general population.
There were no significant demographic and clinical differences between study patients at the 12 month time period and all the other patients alive and active at that 12 month time period (data not shown).
Age, gender, and body mass index did not differ between study patients and normal controls.
Additionally, the creatinine level and platelet count were similar between study patients and normal controls.
The HRQoL score consistency between study patients and their parents was significant across the entire patient age range and within the two patient age strata (8-12 years, 13-17 years). 13-17 years
There were no significant differences in use of these medications between study patients meeting RLS criteria and those who did not.
Another potential concern is the possibility of an increased rate of VAPs in the control groups of the SDD studies because of cross-colonization between study patients and control patients.
Additionally, it must be considered that although our models were adjusted for catecholamine requirements, cardiac index or cardiac power index may not be fully comparable between study patients receiving low- or high-dosed catecholamine infusions.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com