Sentence examples for between all methods were from inspiring English sources

Two-sample t tests were applied to the yields obtained by the different methods, and the differences between all methods were statistically significant within 95%% confidence interval.

The %RSD values for all methods were between 2.7 and 7.1%%.

Comparison of sampling methods showed no statistically significant differences between each method pair or when all methods were compared simultaneously.

The difference in performance between all methods is less compared with AUCDvI.

In the closely related primates, the difference between all methods is smaller, with NN being almost as good as maxAlike, while Freq performs worse (~9.5○C higher T m difference than maxAlike).

Between-run imprecision for all methods was <3.5 %, except for urine albumin and serum HDL-cholesterol in FDS2, for which it was <5.0%%.

Between-run imprecision for all methods was <3.5%, except for urine albumin and serum HDL-cholesterol in phase II, for which it was <5.0%.

The results of all methods are comparable: correlation between the methods was high, all methods showed an approximately two-fold increase in free hemoglobin concentration and mean values in healthy probands, postoperative and septic patients were similar using the four methods.

The main economical differences between all those three methods were the cost of materials used in the procedure.

Correlations between all three methods are consistently high for both markers (Table 1).

The correlations between the measurement methods were all significant at baseline and D2.