Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
Table II shows that, as expected, RMSE for the estimation of CL (Fig. 2), V, and the covariate effect magnitude θmale (Fig. 3) were equal between all methods at both 10%and50%0% of missingness.
Similar(59)
Bland-Altman plots and the Bradley-Blackwood test showed no significant differences between the two methods at all measured ranges of bilirubin.
During the PBGI tree traversal procedure, we introduce a single-receiver traversal scheme for incoherent receivers, a packet traversal scheme for coherent receivers, as well as logic for dynamically switching between these methods at run-time.
However, no statistically differences were observed between both methods at 60 min after ROSC.
Fig. 2 Boxplots of the means over 2001-2007 for the differences between the methods at the sectoral level.
In IM we distinguish between change methods at the individual level and change methods at the environmental level (see Table 2).
This makes it impossible to do a more exhaustive and detailed analysis of the differences between various methods at the level of concrete annotations.
There were no differences between the methods at group level; however, differences occurred at the individual level and the largest differences were between pairwise comparisons and the five point rating scale.
For example, correlation of gene-level values in the LnCaP-24 h sample was high between alignment methods at r = 0.97.
We also assessed the correspondence between the methods at the dyadic and individual levels.
Modular hemiarthroplasties did not reveal a difference in mortality between fixation methods at any time point.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com