Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Therefore, we can conclude that the HAPimLDL method did not perform significantly better than simpler methods within our evolution scenarios.
Similar(59)
As it was shown by several publications, consensus approaches usually work better than simple methods by eliminating the sporadic errors of individual methods.
This assumption may also explain why sophisticated methods can rarely find much better gene signatures than simple methods [ 22].
This method has been shown to perform better than simple substitution methods such as LOD/2 or LOD/√ 2 (Lubin et al. 2004).
This procedure has been reported to perform better than simple substitution methods using LOD/2 or (Baccarelli et al. 2005; Helsel 1990, 2005; Lubin et al. 2004).
We use this benchmark to assess the performance of five different prediction methods and find that the methods that use information about sequence conservation generally perform better than simpler motif-scanning methods.
association, degree ) = n 12 · log [ n 12 λ null ] − | n 12 − λ null |. Results from this more complicated model are included in Table 1, but not discussed in the text as the method is more complicated yet performs no better than simpler Poisson score methods.
Nonlinear methods such as MINE do not perform better than linear Pearson's correlation, and in general, we find that complex methods are no more accurate than simple methods.
This comparison is given in Table 3 which illustrates that representative time series obtained from our proposed merging algorithms preserves the trend and performs better than simple average method.
Further, the post-1999 model performed better than simple spatial interpolation methods (cross-validation R = 0.60 for IDW and 0.61 for NN).
Our results show that although kriging is a statistically optimal method, it is not markedly better than simpler interpolation algorithms, though it is considerably more complex to use.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com