Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
As expected, the large trials showed significantly better reporting quality than small trials.
Further, Cochrane reviews have been found to have better reporting quality than paper-based reviews [ 8, 15].
Moreover, Poolman et al. [ 50] suggested that readers should not assume that studies labelled as Level I are of a high reporting quality, or of a better reporting quality than Level II studies.
Large trials showed significantly better reporting quality than small trials in terms of sequence generating, allocation concealment, blinding, intention to treat, sample size calculation and incomplete follow-up data.
Our findings suggest that readers should not assume that 1) studies labelled as Level I have high reporting quality and 2) Level I studies have better reporting quality than Level II studies.
In 2008, oral presented observational abstracts had a significantly better reporting quality than poster presented abstracts [oral: 9.4 ± 1.9 (score range: 4-13), vs. poster: 8.5 ± 2 (score range: 5-14), p = 0.005, CI 0.28 to 1.54, Figure 3].
Similar(52)
5 However, some items showed almost compatible or even better reporting quality in the Cochrane reviews than in the RCTs.
Higher percentages reflected better reporting quality of the paper.
Social engagement: Surveys of work over the past decade clearly show that people who have relationships live longer lives with better reported experiences of quality than those who do not.
Researchers from the University of Manchester found that people with higher levels of gratitude and positive thoughts before bed slept longer and reported better rest quality than those with more negative thoughts.
The 13 CDSR reviews had overall better reporting than DARE reviews in the abstracts, methods, and results sections; the other categories had similar levels of reporting quality.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com