The phrase "better or comparable performance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the effectiveness or efficiency of different options, products, or methods in relation to one another.
Example: "Our new software offers better or comparable performance compared to the previous version, ensuring a smoother user experience."
Alternatives: "superior or similar performance" or "enhanced or equivalent performance."
Comprehensive experimental results show that VCPSO displays a better or comparable performance compared to the other algorithms in terms of solution accuracy and statistical results.
Experimental results show that AHPS2 displays a better or comparable performance compared to the other swarm-based or evolutionary algorithms in terms of solution accuracy and statistical tests.
This result shows that the proposed method is better or comparable performance compared with the method (M1), (M2) and (M3).
By comparing with other widely used methods, it is found that RD-Metabolizer has better or comparable performance in predicting SOMs and produces fewer false positive metabolites.
Thus we can cost down the deposition of 2nd ARCs layer can be saved with better or comparable performance as that of a DLAR solar cell.
In a KOH-free methanol fuel, we show that a less expensive non-Pt cathode catalyst (derived from Fe-Aminoantipyrine, Fe-AAPyr using Generations 1 and 2 sacrificial silica supports) provide better or comparable performance to commercial Pt cathode catalysts.
Experimental results show that the proposed algorithms produce better or comparable retrieval performance than several state-of-the-art algorithms.
These methods provide better or comparable power performance than some of the robust tests such as MAX3.
The experimental results have shown that the proposed schemes can achieve better or comparable rate-distortion performance compared with the referenced one especially when the motion is low.
Results show that our approach, with the best sensitivity and F1 score, can provide better or at least comparable performance than or to the major existing methods, including KFC, Robetta, FOLDEF, MINERVA and KFC2.
We find that MBF׳s performance is much better if it uses diff-criterion rather than correlation coefficient while mRMR with diff-criterion demonstrates performance better or comparable to mRMR with mutual information.
