better not include

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "better not include" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to advise someone against including something in a discussion, document, or list. Example: "When preparing your presentation, you better not include any outdated information that could mislead the audience."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

When a 12-year-old's mother asks him "How many times do I have to tell you to stop?" he will understand that the answer, if any is required, had better not include a number.

The New York Times - Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

Getting better does not include somebody sniping you 15 times from across the map.

WikiHow

However, the fluid mud flow deposits are usually better sorted, do not include oversized clasts and contain less terrestrial material when compared with tsunami deposits.

Earth, Planets and Space

Ugly men were better off not including one.

The Economist

"Danny's Story" and "Music Make Us Better" are not included.

Wikipedia

"It would have been better not to include it," Donald H. Rumsfeld, the secretary of defense, said on television on Sunday, when asked why his boss was citing foreign intelligence reports instead of his own.

The New York Times

MWJvP6: As there are several different strains of H. influenzae sequenced, I thought it better not to include these strains next to the H. influenzae rd KW20, as they do not represent independent measurements.

Biology Direct

The provision of such treatments is variable and discretionary, however, so that even though their provision definitely indicates disability, it seems better not to include them in the definition adopted for the Magpie Trial.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

If no such cluster can be found for a given protein it might be better not to include it in an incohesive cluster but rather add it as a singleton.

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

If the true value of the coefficients of is zero, because the imputation model is correctly specified without the terms, it is probably better not to include these terms and instead accept some overestimation of : imputation will be more efficient if they are set to zero rather than estimated.

Biometrics

However, if we want to curate only GC-related sentences, it would be better not to include the TFs in the list of genes used as a filter because the terms related to an effect found in a sentence with a GC are also found in sentences that contain only information on RIs.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "better not include", ensure the context clearly indicates what is being advised against. Clarity prevents misinterpretation.

Common error

While generally acceptable, "better not include" can sound informal in certain contexts. Opt for more formal alternatives like "should avoid including" in academic or business documents.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "better not include" functions as a directive or advisory expression. It suggests a course of action involving exclusion, indicating that omitting something is the preferred or more advantageous option. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness in written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

31%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Formal & Business

11%

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "better not include" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that serves as a directive, advising against the inclusion of something, as validated by Ludwig AI. While versatile, it tends towards a neutral to slightly informal register, making it suitable for various contexts, particularly News & Media, Science and Wiki sources. For more formal settings, alternatives like "should avoid including" may be preferable. Understanding its function, purpose, and context ensures its effective and appropriate application in written and spoken communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

should avoid including

Emphasizes a recommendation against inclusion.

ought not to include

Suggests a moral or advisable exclusion.

it's best to exclude

Highlights the advisability of excluding something.

it would be wise to omit

Suggests a prudent exclusion.

is better off without

Focuses on the improved state resulting from exclusion.

should refrain from adding

Advises against adding something.

it's preferable to leave out

Indicates a preference for exclusion.

avoid incorporating

Suggests steering clear of integrating something.

do not incorporate

Directly advises against integrating something.

omit from consideration

Specifically suggests excluding from consideration.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "better not include" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider alternatives like "should avoid including", "ought not to include", or "it is best to exclude depending on the context.

Is "better not include" grammatically correct?

Yes, "better not include" is grammatically correct and commonly used, though it can sometimes sound informal. Ensure the context aligns with this level of formality.

When is it appropriate to use "better not include"?

"Better not include" is appropriate when advising someone against including something, particularly when there might be negative consequences or it's simply unnecessary. Consider context and tone.

What are some common synonyms for "better not include"?

Common synonyms include "should avoid including", "ought not to include", "it would be wise to omit", offering similar guidance with slight variations in emphasis.