Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
better identified for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "better identified for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be an attempt to convey that something is more appropriately recognized or labeled for a specific purpose, but the construction is awkward. Example: "This species is better identified for its unique coloration."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
Alternative expressions(3)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
Parscale later said he regretted being fooled by a bot, but suggested he was less concerned about feeling manipulated by Russia than getting blamed for Twitter's failure to better identify for users who is behind its accounts — or what.
News & Media
There is now a need for future studies to also examine the reasons for different levels of reach and adoption to better identify opportunities for removing barriers to intervention uptake.
Administration officials did not say how the report related to intelligence analysis of the Middle East, which the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Leon E. Panetta, acknowledged in testimony before Congress, needed to better identify "triggers" for uprisings in countries like Egypt.
News & Media
They utilize CT data to better identify patients for bone density screening, thus providing an earlier identification of possible issues.
News & Media
Undertaking upward movement against gravity is much tougher as compared to horizontal movement; average vertical velocity is expected to be a much better identifying parameter for assessing quality of spermatozoa.
Science
Lower treatment thresholds are needed, in order to better identify individuals for treatment.
Science
In this way, we may better identify targets for the development of new classes of nematocides.
Science
This could better identify patients for HDU care and potentially decrease cancellations.
Science
The immediate application will be to better identify candidates for clinical trials of potential AD therapeutics.
Thus, further research is needed to better identify patients for whom switching will and will not bring beneficial clinical and economic outcomes.
Science
The purpose of the ethics review is to facilitate dialogue with scientific investigators and to better identify areas for targeted normative and empirical bioethics research with high impact.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When aiming for clarity, replace "better identified for" with phrases like "more accurately recognized as" or "better classified as" to ensure grammatical correctness and enhance readability.
Common error
Avoid using "better identified for" in formal writing. It often creates awkward sentence constructions. Instead, opt for clearer alternatives that specify the characteristic or feature used for identification.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "better identified for" attempts to describe a process where something is recognized or classified with improved accuracy. Given Ludwig AI's assessment, it's not standard English and presents grammatical issues.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "better identified for" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Ludwig AI suggests that while the intended meaning might be clear – to express enhanced recognition or classification – it's best to avoid this phrase in formal writing. Alternatives such as "more accurately recognized as" or "better classified as" offer improved clarity and grammatical correctness. Due to its lack of usage examples and grammatical issues, exercising caution when using "better identified for" is advisable.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
more appropriately labeled as
Indicates a more suitable or fitting label for something.
better classified as
Highlights the act of categorizing with improved accuracy.
more precisely defined as
Suggests refinement and accuracy in the definition of something.
more accurately recognized as
Emphasizes enhanced precision in recognition, shifting focus from identification process to the result.
more clearly differentiated for
Focuses on the clarity and distinctiveness of the differentiation process.
better known as
Focuses on common knowledge or public perception instead of a formal identification process.
better suited for recognition as
Highlights appropriateness of specific features for identifying something.
more easily distinguished by
Indicates that something can be differentiated with greater ease due to specific traits.
more distinctly characterized by
Highlights characteristic features that make identification more distinct.
more readily associated with
Shifts the focus to the strength of association or connection with something.
FAQs
What are some alternatives to "better identified for"?
Consider using alternatives like "more accurately recognized as", "better known as", or "better classified as" depending on the intended meaning.
Is "better identified for" grammatically correct?
The phrase "better identified for" is not considered standard English. While the intent might be understandable, it's advisable to use grammatically sound alternatives for clarity and professionalism.
How can I use "more accurately recognized as" in a sentence?
Example: "This species is more accurately recognized as a subspecies due to recent genetic studies."
What's the difference between "better identified for" and "better known as"?
"Better known as" implies common or popular recognition, while "better identified for" suggests a more accurate or precise method of recognition. Because the first expression is grammatically sound, prefer it over "better identified for".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
2.2/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested