Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
better evidence
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "better evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when comparing the quality or strength of different pieces of evidence, indicating that one is superior to another. Example: "The new study provides better evidence to support the theory than the previous research did."
✓ Grammatically correct
Academia
News & Media
Science
Formal & Business
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Agencies need better evidence to evaluate programs.
Academia
Recently, new sciences have uncovered better evidence for social intelligence.
Academia
"But I think we'll get better evidence" by waiting.
News & Media
"There was no better evidence than last year.
News & Media
We need better evidence that an Iraqi threat is imminent.
News & Media
I'm confident we can look forward to better evidence.
News & Media
Presented at the Campbell Collaboration Colloquium, Better Evidence for a Better World, Oslo, Norway.
Academia
What better evidence than these playoffs of how thoroughly East has mixed with West.
News & Media
There is no better evidence than Mr. Bremer's schedule in his final days.
News & Media
You might say that it's only because we have better evidence that we make these connections.
News & Media
Better evidence is also needed to support and encourage EBA use.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When presenting "better evidence", clearly articulate why it surpasses previous evidence in terms of reliability, methodology, or scope.
Common error
Avoid claiming that "better evidence" definitively proves a point, especially in complex or evolving fields. Instead, acknowledge that it provides stronger support or increases the likelihood of a particular conclusion.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "better evidence" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It describes evidence that is of higher quality, more reliable, or more persuasive than other evidence. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and widely used, reinforcing its validity.
Frequent in
News & Media
39%
Science
36%
Academia
15%
Less common in
Formal & Business
7%
Wiki
3%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "better evidence" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that signifies evidence of superior quality or reliability. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage across various domains. When employing this phrase, it is vital to articulate the specific reasons why the evidence is "better", such as improved methodology or increased statistical significance. While suitable for both academic and general contexts, users should avoid overstating the significance of "better evidence", acknowledging that it strengthens rather than definitively proves a claim. Alternatives such as "stronger evidence" /s/stronger+evidence and "more compelling evidence" /s/more+compelling+evidence can add nuance to writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
stronger evidence
Emphasizes the strength and persuasiveness of the evidence.
more compelling evidence
Highlights the convincing nature of the evidence.
more convincing proof
Focuses on the ability of the proof to persuade.
superior evidence
Indicates that the evidence is of a higher quality compared to other evidence.
more reliable data
Shifts the focus to the trustworthiness and dependability of the information.
improved data
Suggests an enhancement in the quality or relevance of the data.
more definitive evidence
Implies that the evidence provides a clearer and more conclusive answer.
clearer proof
Emphasizes the clarity and unambiguity of the proof.
more substantiated claims
Focuses on the extent to which claims are supported by evidence.
additional support
Indicates extra backing for an idea or argument.
FAQs
How can I use "better evidence" in a sentence?
Use "better evidence" to indicate that new or existing evidence is more compelling, reliable, or supportive of a claim than previous evidence. For example, "The study offers "stronger evidence" /s/stronger+evidence for the link between diet and health."
What is the difference between "better evidence" and "more evidence"?
"Better evidence" refers to evidence of higher quality or reliability, while "more evidence" simply means a larger quantity of evidence. It’s possible to have "more evidence" /s/more+evidence that is not necessarily better.
What are some alternatives to saying "better evidence"?
Some alternatives include "stronger evidence" /s/stronger+evidence, "more compelling evidence" /s/more+compelling+evidence, "more convincing proof" /s/more+convincing+proof, or "superior evidence depending on the context" /s/superior+evidence.
In academic writing, is "better evidence" too informal?
No, "better evidence" is suitable for academic writing, but ensure you articulate specifically why the evidence is "better". Providing details about the methodology, sample size, or statistical significance strengthens your argument and maintains a scholarly tone. You could replace "better evidence" with phrases like "more rigorous data /s/more+rigorous+data" or "more reliable data /s/more+reliable+data" to provide a formal tone.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested