Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The Beta value for the three predictive variables suggests that compacting pressure explained the bulk of the variance in the compressive strength in cleft of the briquette produced (Beta = 0.670, t = 25.267, p value = 0.000) and was the best predictor of compressive strength in cleft of the briquette produced.
Distribution of methylation beta value for the Qatari family study (red) and the TwinsUK cohort (blue).
The beta value for the Stunkard silhouette in our model is lower than Kaufert et al.'s model (2.435).
However, neither the R-change, nor the beta value for the additional predictor (βself experienced event types*group = −.72) turned statistically significant (p > .05).05
The absolute (unstandardised) beta value for the task variable was recorded (these values are hereafter referred to as the unshuffled test statistics).
The average degree of DNA methylation, i.e., the average beta value for the 319,596 analyzed probes, was higher in fat cells from obese cases (0.425 ± 0.366, mean ± SD) as compared to never-obese controls (0.420 ± 0.375) (P = 1.3 × 10−7).
Similar(54)
In Table 3, beta values for the NO2 model were incorrect.
The y-axes represent estimated beta values for the DBCG and TCGA data sets, respectively, from the univariate analysis.
Each dot represents a miRNA and the x-axes represent estimated beta values for the Oslo2 cohort from the univariate analysis.
For the utility data, standard errors and mean utility values were used to calculate the alpha and beta values for the utility scores associated with each health state.
We found correlations between the beta values for these probes to be above 0.80 for the colon adenocarcinoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and lung squamous cell carcinoma data sets, but 0.73 for gliomas, 0.67 for rectal adenocarcinomas, 0.62 for ovarian carcinomas, and 0.25 for renal papillary cell carcinomas (Supplemental Fig. S6A).
More suggestions(3)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com