Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
For more acute settings of care (e.g., inpatient, SNF, HH), average per beneficiary payment amounts grow exponentially as the number of chronic condition(s) increases.
Comparing the prevalence data from Table 2 to the average per beneficiary payment data from Table 3, it is apparent that a disproportionate share of Medicare payments is spent treating beneficiaries with chronic conditions.
Similar(52)
This is in stark comparison to an average per beneficiary payments for those without any of the six chronic conditions ($2,820 per year).
Moreover, the type of informal payments, beneficiary of these payments, reasons for making informal payments, perceived effects of payments and attitudes toward the presence of informal payments were also investigated.
Both credits are a function of annual household income and prorated according to the beneficiary's payment period (weekly or every four weeks).18 In 2014, the full credits apply for annual household incomes between £0 and £6,420 (HM Treasury 2013).
As the number of chronic conditions increases, the average per beneficiary Medicare payment amount increases dramatically.
As the number of chronic conditions increases, the average per beneficiary Medicare payment amounts increase dramatically (Table 3).
Conversely, the issuer of a life annuity sees a lower pay-off when the annuitant lives longer than expected, because the beneficiary collects payments for a longer period of time.
CFW is a form of conditional cash transfer where beneficiaries receive payment in exchange for work on needed recovery activities including public work tasks, community development activities, shelter repairs/construction, and a number of other similar works.
The average per beneficiary Medicare payments are highest for beneficiaries with CKD ($26,671 in 2005).
CKD is the condition with the highest average per beneficiary Medicare payments at $26,671 in 2005.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com