Sentence examples for beneficiary does from inspiring English sources

(The Senate bill allows for a drug benefit directly through Medicare only if a beneficiary does not have access to more than one private drug insurance plan in his region).

First, nobody knows exactly how marine environments are affected by people, so policy will usually have to be devised before there is conclusive proof of, say, a rise in the sea level or the destruction of habitat.Second, much that happens in and around the sea involves what economists call externalities things that entail costs which the beneficiary does not fully bear.

Thus, Mr. Slabach said, under traditional Medicare, a beneficiary does not have any co-payment for the first 20 days in a skilled nursing home, but some private fee-for-service plans charge $100 a day, and that charge comes as a shock to some patients.

This may be preferable if the income beneficiary doesn't need cash every year, but it can lead to bickering among beneficiaries.

Says Goldman: "The idea is to get the money to the beneficiaries as quickly as possible, and my definition of beneficiary doesn't include the lawyers".

The beneficiary doesn't need to know that those funds were ever transmitted via bitcoin, they only know that the sender had to spend a little less money while doing so.

The beneficiary did not know the ordering physician or the supplier, and the supposed ordering physician denied placing the order or knowing either the patient or the supply company.

Similarly, the Institute of Medicine concluded that geographic variations in cost per Medicare beneficiary do not reflect systematic variations across areas in how individual physicians treat particular conditions [2].

6This approach allows us to include individuals starting in the month that SSA deemed them eligible for benefits, even if a beneficiary did not actually receive a cash payment in that month (perhaps because the disability determination occurred after the time he or she was first eligible).

That year, the OGE issued an opinion explaining that government employees' legal defense funds could solicit anonymous donations, even if they came from lobbyists, as long as the fund's beneficiary didn't receive the money directly and didn't know who put up the cash.

Respondents were more likely to select less costly, more effective interventions with a strong evidence base where the beneficiary did not contribute to their illness.