Sentence examples for benchmarks table from inspiring English sources

Fig. 4 Cumulative score of the benchmarks Table 2 MAE of the benchmarks Algorithm MAE (year) GPR (K=10) 8.83 GPR (K=100) 7.94 GPR (K=1000) 7. 3 0 SVR (linear) 8.73 SVR (Gaussian) 7.66 MLG 10.98 OPLDA 8.45 OPMFA 9.08 Bold and italic bold indicate the best and second-best performance.

Based on our benchmarks (Table 1), we estimate this analysis would have completed in ~9 days on a single CPU using the same algorithm.

To demonstrate how many were totally compliant with the cleaning benchmarks, Table 3 provides a summary of all the patient-used scopes and all the sites tested that were cleaned only by the ECR.

Each existing system's main features are presented in a benchmark table, where each feature is assigned a weighting factor.

If possible, a trusted technology (e.g., Sanger sequencing) needs to be applied to a data set in order obtain the gold standard benchmark (Table 1).

We apply the Stream benchmark (Table 3) to our virtual machines.

It's also worth noting that some of the results were obtained on prototype samples, rather than shipped smartphones, so haven't yet been included in the benchmark table on the team's website.

It's also worth noting that some of the results were obtained on prototype samples, rather than shipped smartphones, so haven't yet been included in the benchmark table on the team's website.

As a benchmark, Table 11 shows the (biased) OLS estimates for the three countries, which reveals the same patterns as for micro firms: negative correlations in Spain and positive correlations in France and the UK.

They are illustrated in Table 3. Fig. 7 Final implemented architecture for PI benchmark Table 3 Response time of implemented architecture Configuration Response time Speed-up C1 8394 ms – C2 9322 ms 0.9 × C3 4751 ms 1.7 × C4 3198 ms 2.6 × C5 2474 ms 3.4 × C7 2257 ms 3.7 ×.

c Box plot of the CTDIvol-median value, interquartile range, total range and outliers for all CT-lumbar spine examinations on four CT systems with the national P75 and P25 DRLs as benchmark Table 4 Median CTDIvol (mGy) per scanner for the different CT regions.