To test the goodness of fit between model and benchmark, we compare the scaling of the X and Y propagation of flows through time to analytical solutions where they are known (unconfined horizontal and sloping flow).
Although it is very difficult to make a fair benchmark, we compare the speed of Ψ-RA against Bowtie [ 5], which is one of the fastest aligners, to provide a comparison on the exact and also approximate matching performance.
For benchmarking, we compared the ChitO-based assay to the Schales' procedure since it is one of the most common methods for the detection of chitinase activity [ 7, 13].
Besides, for the sake of benchmarking, we compare the outage probability of the proposed cooperative scheme with that obtained without cooperation and the following relay selection strategies.
To benchmark this result, we compared the in vivo efficacy of FP with vincristine, a drug that has often been used to treat NMC patients, and which was one of the most effective agents in our in vitro screen.
In order to benchmark this definition, we compared the results obtained by this definition against a stricter one (for example a threshold of 60% non-zero read counts in each profile).
As a benchmark of our method, we compared the genomes of several species with themselves, using identical processing and filtering.
To benchmark the optimal assignment methods, we compared the results with FieldScreen, the 166 bit MACCS keys and DOCK.
In order to benchmark this immunological relevance for genes, we compared the score against a set of validated immune resources.
To benchmark the quality of our assembly, we compared the B. braunii Showa transcriptome to the core set of 458 conserved proteins (CEGs) that occur in a wide variety of eukaryotes [ 41].
