Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(7)
For the analysis of polymorphisms between orthologs presented below, we included orthologs identified by only one method if they aligned over at least 50% of the length of the longer protein, and had a sequence identity of at least 30%.
For time calibration (below), we included Tegeticula (Prodoxidae) and Galagete (Autostichidae).
However, because study type accounted for large amounts of variation in effect sizes, and because the inclusion of other variables often led to a significant effect of study type (see below), we included it as a factor in all analyses to increase the power of detecting effects of the ecological variables.
In addition to sampling from two geographic areas of different composite SES (below), we included direct observer ratings of neighborhoods.
As overlaps between male and female song were extremely rare during courtship (see below), we included only one example of an overlap (shaded in green).
For the analysis comparing LOS service receipt to population controls (described below), we included 685 of these respondents; men were excluded (n = 57) to facilitate comparisons with the controls.
Similar(53)
Below, we include a brief description of DNA catalysts with a focus on metal-responsive RNA- and DNA-cleaving DNAzymes and a section on their applications.
Below we include such modification.
Although the next Proposition must be known (in view of Aleksandrov's criterion [1]), see Theorem 15 below), we include a simple geometric proof for the reader's convenience.
Below we include a nontrivial example of an infinite family of Bregman weak relatively nonexpansive mappings in order to reconstruct a Bregman W-mapping in the setting of Hilbert spaces.
Below we include three example use-cases for the dashboard webapp, which highlight the major features of the application, as well as its practicality in performing cross-dataset comparisons.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com