Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(42)
Scores equal to or below this cutoff were categorized as high risk while scores above the cutoff were categorized as low risk.
When emission was below this cutoff the quantum dot was defined as residing in a "dark" or "off" state.
However, there was no difference in overall mean values [3.69 vs 3.68 mm (p = 0.884)] or between-subject variance [14.49 vs 11.92 (p = 0.54)] above or below this cutoff.
This cutoff is approximate and based on a statistical probability that approximately 97.8% of random measurements will fall below this cutoff, and is used to provide a quantitative separation between verified true respiratory motion and noise.
Endocytosis of small particles (<100 nm) by mammalian macrophages have been shown to be insensitive to cytochalasin D [25], [26], and the hydrodynamic diameter of QDs (<20 nm) falls well below this cutoff.
Based on our previous observations of p63 occupancy for various control negative regions [24], we defined validated targets as those regions showing greater than 2.5 occupancy units by qPCR as the negative controls were consistently below this cutoff.
Similar(18)
Of note, all controls revealed ratios below 10 for this cutoff value.
Below this flux cutoff, pixel locations are assumed to be background pixels.
All of those measurements that fell below this intensity cutoff were substituted by the respective surrogate value of 15.
Scores at or below this stringent cutoff E value of 10-6 were counted as positive.
Several studies in adults suggested that future diabetes risk increases continually with increasing FPG even below this lower cutoff for normoglycemia (1, 2).
More suggestions(18)
below this break
below this boundary
below this borderline
below this ceiling
below this switching
below this article
below this letter
below this someone
below this galaxy
below this bio
below this interval
below this place
below this range
below this point
below this class
below this blog
below this post
below this sea
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com