Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Although 88% (open + private acceptance of evolution; choices a + c, Fig. 6) of the New England educators of prospective teachers sampled in this study accepted evolution, their score was below the general faculty (97%, choices a + c, Fig. 6) and comparable to the students' (83%, choices a + c, Fig. 6), the latter higher than their national counterparts (above).
Similar(59)
Although 93% of the general faculty, educators, and students knew that evolution relies on common ancestry, 26% of the general faculty, 45% of the educators, and 35% of the students did not know that humans are apes.
Interestingly, ≈36% of the general faculty, educators and students considered religion to be very important in their lives, and 17% of the general faculty, 34% of the educators, and 28% of the students said they prayed daily.
The level of understanding of how evolution works varied among the general faculty, educators of prospective teachers, and students.
The educators held intermediate positions in respect to the general faculty and the students: 94% of the general faculty, 75% of the educators, and 63% of the students said they accepted evolution openly; and 82% of the general faculty, 71% of the educators, and 58% of the students thought that evolution is definitely true.
Aristotle devotes a great deal of attention to perception, discussing both the general faculty and the individual senses.
In addition, a panel composed of members of the general college faculty will discuss the impact of Balanchine's work.
Subjects were recruited from a university campus clinical center, and from the general university student, faculty, and staff populations.
The quote below, reflected the general sentiment expressed.
Table 1 below shows the general characteristics of the studies.
These faculty ought to exhibit the best knowledge of biological evolution, compared to non- life scientist faculty, the general public, and students.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com