In the plot it is possible to see that the ratio values from 6 patients (A F), dashed thick trace, produce ratio values clearly below or above the control range.
The control value obtained was 67.6 ± 22.9%; the value of 53% of 5-1-4 tri-groups at the RGD site therefore lies within the control range, albeit 14.6% below the mean value.
The recorded value, however, was only marginally below the historical control range (1.1 2.8 %), the absolute eosinophil counts were not altered (data not shown), and none of the other differential blood cell fractions were changed.
Since the globulin levels were in fact marginally below the historical control range, this alteration was regarded as possibly treatment-related, but not adverse (ECETOC 2002).> > -wrap-foot> alaninenine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, AP alkaline phosphatase, gGT gamma glutamyl transferase; TP total protein, Alb.
Both S11 and S22 are below than –10 dB in all the control voltage range.
D: decreased, below the range of control values.
Both compounds induced changes in the gene expression profiles ranging from a 3-fold-increase to 0.3 times below the controls (Figure 10).
In Experiment 1, high-grade patients had great difficulties, being constantly below the range of controls (Table C; Supplementary material).
INR control will be calculated based on the patient's individual target INR range, and defined as such as within this range ('therapeutic'), below the range ('subtherapeutic') or above the range ('supratherapeutic').
For soil 2, the tissue P concentration and 1000P/Zn ratios for N alone and control treatments were below the optimum range of 3.5 8.0 g/kg (dry weight), and 700 930, respectively, (Ludwick 2002; Hartz and Johnstone 2007), whereas, the N/P ratio was far above the optimum range, suggesting P availability was limiting.
