Sentence examples for below the control mean from inspiring English sources

Among the SGA group, 54% had a mean testicular volume >2 SD below the control mean (ie, <16 mL) and in these subjects, the inhibin B level was low (143 ± 46 pg/mL vs 229 ± 76 pg/mL; P <.0001).

Application of these nine drugs reduced ATP concentrations with at least 2-fold or more potency for NSCs than hESCs, and NSC values were 15% or more below the control mean.

Values were considered abnormal if they were less than 2 SDs below the control mean.

Figure 4 shows the 2D space formed by phonological skills and phonological representations, with the four quadrants defined by deviance thresholds set a priori at −1.5 SD below the control mean.

Figure 1 displays (in the form of z-scores) all the quantitative production analysis and semantic content measures on which at least one transcript was associated with a score that fell 1.5 or more standard deviations below the control mean.

This, therefore, suggests that the specific profile of phonological deficits may differ, to some extent, between children with dyslexia and those with SLI. Figure 3 reproduces the 2D space of Bishop and Snowling (2004) and Fig. 1B, with the four quadrants defined by deviance thresholds set a priori at −1.5 SD below the control mean.

Study trainees' results were expressed as the standard deviation above or below this control mean, and compared using a permutation test, with P < 0.05 considered significant.

Clinically significant cognitive impairment, defined as ≥1.5 SD below the control group mean, was reported for 24% of BD I and 13% of BD II outpatients [ 16], versus 42% and 25%, respectively, in the present study.

Participants in the LH damage (LHD) group exhibited impaired language abilities compared to controls, with a significant difference between groups for the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) [ 41] aphasia quotient, t(20) = -5.356, p =.002, and with each participant in the LHD group scoring more than one standard deviation below the control group mean aphasia quotient (M = 99.46; SD =.7974).

The U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) showed that intensive glycemic control (mean A1C below 7%) by means of insulin or oral agents in type 2 diabetic patients reduces the relative risk for microvascular outcomes by 25% over a period of 10 years (relative risk reduction).

Weak control means that the FWER is maintained below a given error level under the intersection (or complete) null hypothesis.