Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
The literature search aimed to identify all studies evaluating the clinical effectiveness of an AED in dogs with presumptive IE. Specifically, studies were evaluated based on the inclusion criteria below: Criterion 1-Type of study: Peer-reviewed studies in English (or translated).
Factor loadings below criterion of.40 were suppressed.
The three criteria, proposed to minimise the effect of dropout on our moa data are discussed below: Criterion 1 involved a 4x singleplex PCR repeat method (multiple tubes approach) for each apparent homozygote.
Polymorphic markers that did not appear in the final maps failed due to sequence ambiguities that decreased the number of map cross progeny scored for those markers below criterion (85 individuals).
However, performance accuracy of 6 pigs decreased to below criterion after criterion was reached for one session (ID F1 session 10; ID F8 session 5; ID M9 session 14; and ID M14 session 6), 2 sessions (ID M10 sessions 9 and 10), and 3 sessions (ID M13 sessions 5, 7, and 11) but then improved and maintained high accuracy scores.
Similar(55)
Table 2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria for START Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria Patients will be eligible for inclusion if they meet all of the below criteria.
(S1) Test costs calculation was conducted using the below criteria: Tests with low administration rates (about 30% or lower in the overall average) were excluded.
Medication costs calculation was conducted using the below criteria: Only medicines with a high administration rate (approximately 30% or higher in the overall average) were included.
Two participants were excluded due to below-criterion performance on the screening task and a third participant was excluded because of poor accuracy on single-target control trials (below two SDs of the sample mean).
Developing quality test scripts here means, ensuring that the test scripts meet the below mentioned criteria: correctness, maintainability, versioning, integrity, portability, performance.
All articles fulfilling the below-mentioned criteria were selected and data were extracted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com