Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
We conducted a two-way repeated measure ANOVA concerning the synchronous asynchronous difference and belonging type (Fig. 4a).
Second, we conducted a two-way repeated measure ANOVA concerning the synchronous asynchronous difference and belonging type in Preston's (2013) questionnaire (Fig. 5b).
There was also a significant interaction between the synchrony asynchrony difference and belonging type (F 1, 18) = 14.189, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.4408).
The interaction between the synchrony asynchrony difference and belonging type was also significant (F 1, 18) = 16.027, p < 0.001, ηp 2 = 0.4710).
First, we conducted a two-way repeated measure ANOVA concerning the synchronous asynchronous difference and belonging type based on data collected from Longo et al.'s (2008) questionnaire.
There was also a significant interaction between synchronous asynchronous difference and belonging type (F 1, 11) = 8.101, p < 0.05, ηp 2 = 0.4241).
Similar(53)
Among 5 resistant isolates that were typed, 3 belonged to type 1 and 2 belonged to type 2. *VTR, variable tandem repeat.
Strains belonging to type I were represented in the proteome Group A, while Group B contained type III strains.
CBM17 is a family 17 carbohydrate-binding module, belonging to type B [ 16, 17].
CBM3, belonging to type A, can bind both surfaces of crystalline and amorphous celluloses [ 8, 12].
All the strains belonging to type II were clustered together with a high degree of confidence.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com