Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
It's plausible to suppose that much if not all of the value that we place on believing rationally depends on a connection between believing rationally and believing what is true (although the precise nature of this connection is no doubt a particularly vexing topic).
One might worry that a view according to which even ideal, perfect rationality can coexist harmoniously with a more or less completely mistaken view of one's situation threatens to attenuate the connection between believing rationally and believing truly too far, and to render obscure why the former would be valuable relative to the latter.
Similar(58)
One first step to making progress on this question is to see if what we believe already rationally settles this question.
So, it seems that the Naive Russellian's conditions for rationally believing a proposition and its negation are not met.
You can think rationally.
I think rationally so.
To make everyone think rationally.
"He can't think rationally.
"Eventually, I could think rationally.
We need to think rationally.
She can't think rationally about this.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com