Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"believable information" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to refer to information that is likely to be correct or reliable. For example: "The journalist sourced believable information to back up her claims."
Exact(1)
This is supported by a study of hypertension that points to the role of physicians' question styles in receiving believable information on adherence [ 43].
Similar(56)
Credible information is reputable, unbiased / objective, and trustable / believable.
Like the precocious kid from our youth, the Internet is often flooded with believable but wrong information.
They said the defense could argue that the tapes might have raised questions about whether the information was believable or whether Abu Zubaydah had invented it simply to stop aggressive interrogation techniques.
For simplicity, it is assumed that the prior knowledge of map services is believable and their incorrect information can be regardless.
"Online trust includes consumer perceptions of how the site would deliver on expectations, how believable the site's information is, and how much confidence the site commands".
The qualitative data from in-depth interviews of Members of Parliament also revealed that the current health warnings were perceived to be inadequate, less noticeable, less believable and provide less information than pictorial health warning.
The first major edit was the removal of the scene where the children throw snowballs at a tin can (one rumor that I have not been able to substantiate in any way was that the tin can originally was a Coca-Cola can. Seems believable, but I have no information at all to verify that).
Thus, adolescents who view alcohol references on their peers' Facebook profiles find these to be believable and influential sources of information (Moreno et al. 2009 a ).
In the thread type a few sentences on the information that sound believable.
Its not that that this information is any more believable, but it demonstrates how you can get a vastly different picture by slicing things differently or using a different method.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com