being too comprehensive

USAGE SUMMARY

"being too comprehensive" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe something that is too wide-ranging or detailed. For example, "The project requirements were being too comprehensive and it was difficult to find a solution that met all of them."

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

If anything, it may be too comprehensive.

The New York Times - Books

It's too long, the "Guide" footnotes are too comprehensive, the "further reading" gags too frequent.

The Guardian - Books

A ranking can be heterogeneous, in other words, as long as it doesn't try to be too comprehensive.

The New Yorker

Judge Jones's opinion is too comprehensive to provide any type of exhaustive analysis here, but it is worth pausing to emphasize a few of the more important aspects of the decision.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

There was general concern about the organisation of systematic health checks and whether they were too comprehensive to be manageable in general practice.

BMC Family Practice

Many of the earlier participants in the focus group and experts consulted agreed that the survey was too comprehensive to start with.

BMC Health Services Research

A complete and detailed description of the derivation of our weighted unranking algorithm for (SSU and LSU r RNA secondary structures can be found in the Appendix, since it is too comprehensive to be presented here and the different steps for its generation correspond to those described in [ 20].

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

However, the overall opinion was that the instrument was too comprehensive and time consuming, and that several items were not relevant in Swedish RCFs, as illustrated in the following quote: "It took me a long time to go through the form, I of course wonder if it is possible to shorten it in a future Swedish version.

BMC Geriatrics

As the complete presentation of this algorithm would be too comprehensive, we decided to omit it and instead refer to Algorithms 1 to 4 and 6 given in [ 20], since for the construction of our unranking algorithm, we had to use exactly these Algorithms as subroutines.

Algorithms for Molecular Biology

Write a good introduction that is comprehensive and informative without being too long.

WikiHow

Although the number of informative sites and allele diversity was too low for comprehensive analysis, eBURST and phylogenetic analysis revealed a consistent division between STs 6 and 7 and the rest of the B. quintana population.

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "being too comprehensive", ensure you clarify why the comprehensiveness is problematic. Is it overwhelming, impractical, or unnecessary? Adding context enhances clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "being too comprehensive" as a vague criticism. Instead, specify which aspects are excessive. For example, instead of saying "The report is being too comprehensive", specify "The report includes too much unnecessary data, making it difficult to extract key findings."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "being too comprehensive" functions as a descriptor, indicating that something possesses an excessive level of detail or scope. Although Ludwig AI indicates that is correct and usable in written English, there aren't specific usage examples to fully illustrate its function.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "being too comprehensive" is a grammatically correct phrase used to express that something is excessively detailed or broad. As per Ludwig AI, the phrase is valid, yet there are no direct examples provided to gauge frequency across diverse sources. When using this phrase, ensure you clarify why the comprehensiveness is problematic to avoid vagueness. Consider rephrasing for conciseness depending on your context with options like "excessively detailed" or "overly broad". This phrase tends to be neutral in register, fitting both formal and informal scenarios.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

being excessively detailed

Focuses specifically on the level of detail rather than overall scope.

being overly exhaustive

Emphasizes the thoroughness and completeness, potentially to a tiring degree.

being needlessly thorough

Highlights the unnecessary nature of the comprehensiveness.

being excessively broad

Shifts the focus to the wide scope rather than the depth of coverage.

being too extensive

Similar to 'broad' but suggests a wide-ranging scope that might be unmanageable.

being unnecessarily inclusive

Highlights that the scope includes elements that are not needed.

being too all-encompassing

Emphasizes the complete and total nature of the coverage.

being more than necessary

A simpler way to express that something goes beyond what is required.

being excessively inclusive

Similar to 'unnecessarily inclusive', focusing on the inclusion of too many elements.

being overly ambitious in scope

Highlights the overreaching nature of the scope or scale of something.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "being too comprehensive" to sound more concise?

Consider alternatives like "overly detailed", "excessively broad", or "needlessly thorough" to convey the same meaning more succinctly. The best choice depends on the specific context.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "being too comprehensive"?

Use "being too comprehensive" when you want to express that something includes an excessive amount of detail or scope, making it impractical or unmanageable. It's appropriate when the comprehensiveness hinders rather than helps.

What is the difference between "being too comprehensive" and "being comprehensive"?

"Being comprehensive" generally implies thoroughness and completeness, which is usually positive. "Being too comprehensive" suggests that this thoroughness has become excessive and detrimental. It's about finding the right balance.

Are there any negative connotations associated with "being too comprehensive"?

Yes, the phrase typically carries a negative connotation, implying that something is unnecessarily detailed or broad. This can lead to inefficiency, confusion, or impracticality. Consider alternatives such as "excessively detailed" or "overly broad" if you intend to soften the criticism.