Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Despite one study (by Jaffar and colleagues) being an equivalence trial, another (by Matovu and colleagues) being a non-inferiority trial and the other three being superiority trials, this did not affect the overall result (i.e. no evidence of heterogeneity).
Similar(59)
It's superiority.
This imitation isn't flattery, it's superiority.
It is superiority to the conventional Gebhart's method in view of the grey body and the diffuse reflection assumptions.
So if you're Superiority, what are you not?
Facilitator: If you're Superiority, what are you not?
*Studies were superiority trials unless otherwise stated.
The secondary end point was superiority with regard to a lower incidence of adverse events.
Alternatively, they could all be superiority or non-inferiority designs but with different controls.
These designs could be superiority, non-inferiority designs, or historical controlled designs.
The majority of RCTs are superiority trials, where the aim is to test whether one treatment is better than another (or than placebo).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com