However, the anatomical referencing method requires a higher computational effort without being significantly better than the automatic method.
Note that this significance test does not compare two screening experiments and cannot be interpreted as one experiment being significantly better than the other.
RESULTS: Clinical Global Impressions scales response rates in the intention-to-treat sample were 29 (50.9%) (FLU), 31 (51.7%) (CCBT), 32 (54.2%) (CCBT/FLU), 30 (50.8%) (CCBT/PBO), and 19 (31.7%) (PBO), with all treatments being significantly better than PBO.
Post hoc pairwise comparisons between the methods found almost all compared methods to be significantly different from each other, with SSD being significantly worse, and HP-Infomax being significantly better than the other four methods ((p<0.05)).
The mean AUC for plethodontid distribution models based on current climate was 0.911 (range = 0.664 0.995; median = 0.940; Table S1), with each species' model AUC being significantly better than random (i.e., model AUC values exceeded the 95 percentile of the null AUC distributions).
However, no single intervention was identified as being significantly better than others at increasing EBM competency.
