Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
The main reason for being not evaluable at first formal evaluation was early disease progression.
Nonevaluable patients were included into the intention-to-treat analyses but reported as being not evaluable.
Similar(58)
Seven patients had stable disease, four were not evaluable for response but were not progressive, and three were not evaluated.
Sixteen patients (10.2%) were not evaluable for the final response evaluation because their planned R-CHOP could not be completed.
The response of one patient was not evaluable.
The effect on other symptoms such as pain and discharge is not evaluable.
Excluding 22 (19.6%) patients that were not evaluable for COO IHC testing, GCB vs non-GCB was observed in 47 (42.0%) vs 43 (38.4%) cases respectively.
Seven patients were not evaluable for response; 4 refused or received no treatment, treatment in 2 failed (myocardial infarction and pneumonia), and 1 was lost to follow-up.
Two patients were not evaluable (8.3%).
In 56 (22 %) treatment efficacy was not evaluable.
The cost-effectiveness ratio for CBT treatment was not evaluable due to negative clinical effects.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com