Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
A single set of SNPs was used, each SNP being informative in at least one of the four pedigrees.
Recombination maps were computed for each pedigree independently using a single set of SNPs, each SNP being informative in at least one of the four pedigrees.
Similar(57)
In addition, each SNP was informative in at least 4 samples (average of 10 informative samples/SNP) (Figure 1).
These markers were informative in at least one family and were used to construct our new consensus LG5 map.
Between 176 and 198 of the assays were informative in at least one of the three available mapping populations.
Taken together, a total of 64,889 SNPs that were informative in at least one of the three mapping families were used.
DNA from each tumour, except from five tumours, was informative in at least five (median 18, range 5 21) of the loci analysed (Thorstensen et al, 2001; Diep et al, 2002, unpublished).
> -wrap-foot> Because our SNP discovery panel was limited to 20 accessions across five subpopulations of domestic rice and we purposely selected SNPs that would be informative in at least 2 or more subpopulations where possible, there are no SNPs in the panel of lines studied here with a minor allele frequency < 10%.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02869.012 > -wrap-foot> To further investigate the relationship between driver genetic lesions in TEDG, we assess their associations and anti-associations in a cross-sectional cohort of 1403 CLL patients, of which 1054 cases are informative in at least one lesion.
When the parents of the three mapping populations were tested with the set of microsatellites, 214 were informative in at least one combination, while 153 across all the three combinations, thus supplying landmarks for comparative mapping of phenotypic and quantitative trait loci (QTLs).
Out of 1321 microsatellite primer pairs tested, 168 did not give any amplification at two annealing temperatures (58 and 52°C) and 366 were monomorphic in the test sample and 796 were informative in one family at least.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com