Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

being identified

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "being identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are discussing the process of recognition or classification of someone or something. Example: "The suspect was being identified by witnesses during the police lineup."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"They're not being identified properly".

She is not being identified.

News & Media

The Guardian

Others fear being identified for different reasons.

News & Media

The New York Times

They weren't worried about being identified.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Additional ones are being identified.

He insisted on not being identified.

News & Media

The New York Times

Cameron says bodies are being identified.

News & Media

The Guardian

I like being identified as an outsider.

But she doesn't like being identified as a party promoter.

News & Media

The New York Times

These processes are now being identified by scientific research.

News & Media

The New York Times

The official spoke on condition of not being identified.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To enhance clarity, consider replacing the passive voice with an active construction when possible, specifying who is making the identification (e.g., "Researchers are identifying new genes" instead of "New genes are being identified").

Common error

Avoid using "being identified" excessively, especially in contexts where the actor is easily identifiable. Overuse of passive voice can make writing seem vague and less engaging. Opt for the active voice when it provides more directness and clarity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "being identified" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that the subject is receiving the action of identification. As Ludwig AI confirms, it signifies an ongoing process of recognition or classification. The phrase is commonly found in contexts where the identifier is either unknown, unimportant, or to maintain a formal tone.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

57%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Reference

2%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "being identified" is a passive verb phrase widely employed to indicate that a subject is undergoing a process of recognition or classification. Ludwig AI confirms that it's grammatically correct and commonly used in various contexts. Predominantly found in news and media and scientific writing, its usage lends a degree of formality and objectivity. To improve clarity, consider rephrasing with active voice when possible. The analysis provides valuable insights into its grammatical function, communicative purpose, and stylistic implications.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "being identified" to be more active?

You can change "being identified" to an active voice by specifying who is doing the identifying. For example, instead of "The problem is being identified", try "Experts are identifying the problem" or "We are identifying the problem".

What is a good synonym for "being identified" in a scientific context?

In a scientific context, suitable synonyms for "being identified" include "being classified", "being characterized", or "being detected". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use "being identified" or "identified as"?

Both "being identified" and "identified as" are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different uses. "Being identified" describes an ongoing process, while "identified as" describes a completed state. For instance, "The suspect is being identified by witnesses" versus "The suspect was identified as the perpetrator".

When should I avoid using "being identified"?

You should avoid using "being identified" when it leads to ambiguity or vagueness. If the actor doing the identifying is unknown or unimportant, consider rephrasing to provide more clarity. For example, instead of "Mistakes are being identified", specify "Auditors are identifying mistakes".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: