Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
As h varies, we observed different behaviour of the methods.
Similar(59)
Numerical results show the behaviour of the method with emphasis on treatment of boundary conditions.
The behaviour of the method for the two extreme cases was specially investigated.
Figure 4 COurarimmediateficate rates.
Such a strategy may have the advantage to partially cancel errors in the activity-concentration estimation, if it is assumed that the behaviour of the method is the same for spheres in a phantom as in for tumours in patients, and could thus be interesting as a way to reduce the uncertainty of the activity concentration estimation.
However, convergence of posterior samples is essential to ensure a good behaviour of the method.
In order to better understand the behaviour of these methods in the PPD, we compare the performance of traditional approaches (LOCF, CC) and theoretically sound techniques (MI, ML), under various MAR mechanisms.
The goal of this simulation exercise is to illustrate the behaviour of these methods in two contrasting scenarios, the first one corresponding to a logistic model with interactions, the second one to a situation with true contrasting profiles.
The behaviour of the two methods will be different when q is large.
The final covariance matrix G is: First, four simulations were carried out to check the behaviour of the different methods for fine mapping.
At the same time, as is always the case when genetic algorithms are used, although simple to implement the behaviour of this method is difficult to understand.
More suggestions(15)
behaviour of the coatings
behaviour of the connections
behaviour of the complexes
behaviour of the joints
behaviour of the composites
behaviour of the solutions
behaviour of the components
behaviour of the participants
behaviour of the copolymers
behaviour of the parents
behaviour of the plates
behaviour of the agents
behaviour of the algorithms
behaviour of the networks
behaviour of the cells
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com