Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Since only maternal behaviors that occurred in response to the child's behavior were rated on this scale, we controlled for the variability in the number of child-elicited events across dyads by dividing the number of positive responses by the total number of child-elicited events, resulting in a percentage of positive responsiveness out of all possible types of responses.
Similar(59)
Each behavior was rated on a Likert-type scale with five possible responses corresponding to the frequency of the behavior in the preceding week (zero = never, four = all the time).
Behaviors are rated on a 4-point scale that ranges from 'Very True' to 'Not True'.
The frequency of sleep behavior is rated for the most recent "typical" week on a three point Likert scale, with the response options usually (5 to 7 times per week), sometimes (2 to 4 times per week) and rarely (0 to 1 time per week).
Teachers completed a questionnaire on children's social behavior (SOCOMP; [ 61]) The two dimensions self- versus other-oriented social skills were built using a combination of six subscales of social behavior patterns All items were rated on a four-point scale (0 = not at all true to 4 = definitely true).
Girls' behavior was rated much lower by teachers than boys' behavior compared to parents' ratings.
Compared to parents, however, girls' behavior was rated much lower by teachers than boys' behavior.
Each of the items describes a behavior that is rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all true) to 3 (very much true).
Each item describes a behavior that is rated on a 4-point Likert scale from 0 (not at all true) to 3 (very true).
As per Hudson and Rapee [ 148], maternal behavior will be rated on 10 global scales, scored on a 9-point continuum from 0 to 8 with 4 being neutral.
The third is the behavior subscale, which is rated on a nominal scale that includes actual, aborted, and interrupted attempts; preparatory behavior; and non-suicidal self-injurious behavior.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com