Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
For each one of these problems a heuristic objective function is selected based on the physical behavior of the problem.
The interactive nature of this tool allows the designer to learn about the behavior of the problem.
If some (alpha_{k_{0}} <1), then the interaction between the lateral surfaces (S_{varepsilon} k_{0})) of the thin cylinders (G_{varepsilon} k_{0})) and the outside medium is very intensive and plays a dominant role in the asymptotic behavior of the problem (1.2 - 1.3 1.2 - 1.3
Similar(57)
The other one is investigating learners' behavior of the problem-posing process by extending their posed problems (Singer et al. 2011).
Unfortunately for the addict -and for the "co-dependent -minded editors who, with their magico-dependent -mindede that their words co-dependent -mindedvior of otheditorshe problem is only exacerbated by this unempathic, uninformed and controlling point of viewho
A soft coating parameter, which controls the yield behavior of this problem, is defined.
The quadratic objective function q(d) reflects the local properties of the original objective function and the main reason to use a quadratic function is that such problems are easy to solve yet mimics the nonlinear behavior of the initial problem.
In order to improve the convergence behavior of the contact problem, a C2-continuous contact surface is constructed from the scattered set of particles.
Our results indicated that the proposed technique improves the consensus performance considerably and solves the undesirable memoryless asymptotic behavior of the original problem.
Indeed it is already known from previous studies (see [5]) that the asymptotic behavior of the ε-problem differs in terms of the homogenized problems in the two cases (gamma<1) and (gamma=1).
The coefficients arising from integrals with singular kernels greatly influence the well behavior of the system the problem is reduced at, and that is why it is very important to choose a suitable technique to evaluate them with great accuracy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com