Sentence examples for behavior of both protocols from inspiring English sources

In Figure4, the performance behavior of both protocols is analyzed in terms of delay-time with the number of PUs.

We observe a similar behavior of both the protocols with low and high number of PUs.

In Figure3, the performance behavior of both the protocols versus the number of PUs is analyzed in terms of overhead.

In Figure6, the performance behavior of both the protocols is evaluated in terms of overhead when the number of CUs increases.

In Figure7, the performance behavior of both the protocols is analyzed in terms of delay-time when the number of CUs increases.

In Figure5, the performance behavior of both the protocols is analyzed in terms of hop count when the number of PUs increases.

To capture the behavior of such protocols, Lossy Channel Systems (LCS's) have been proposed.

These findings are important for understanding the behavior of routing protocols and their effect on TCP performance.

However, the difference between the behavior of two protocols is more pronounced than the similarity, and the superiority of cooperative MAC is clear in this setting.

The simulation time equates to about 8000 contention cycles, what seems to be sufficient to achieve valid data statistics also about the long term behavior of the protocols.

We show that, in addition to time-efficient, accurate, consistent, and repeatable performance evaluation of ad hoc protocols, the proposed modeling framework provides interesting insights into the impact of parameters on behavior of these protocols.