Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
As before, the main effect of the group was not significant F(2.68,74.97) (p>0.05).
As before, the main effect for individuals represents the variation among individuals and is symmetrized completely.
As before, the main effect of %CV was not significant but we observed a significant cue × %CV interaction effect (F1.99,29.88 = 4.7, P = 0.017).
Similar(57)
A GLMM model was used as before but the main effect tested was location (IA-I versus IA-II).
As before, there was no significant difference between the groups' rankings as the main effect was F(2.91,81.23)=1.57 (p>0.05).
The main effect terms were centered before the interaction term was computed.
For time, the main effect is significant with both measurements taken before and after the test (F 1, 56) = 92.68, p = 0.000).
The main effect is of non-resolution.
"The main effect is tactile hallucinations," he said.
The main effect of before/after was significant as well, F 1, 4) = 19.95, MSe = 325.47, p <.01, \documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\eta_{\text{p} }^2 = 0.{842} $$\end{document}.
The main effect of social partner disappeared.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com