Sentence examples for been systematically reviewed for from inspiring English sources

Although the global community recognizes that pneumonia is an important public health issue in China, the disease burden is not well studied nor necessarily reported in the English language and these data have not been systematically reviewed for English- or Chinese-language readers [8].

However, this treatment has not been systematically reviewed for its efficacy against essential hypertension (EH).

Besides, the influence of electrodeposition and annealing treatment conditions are systematically reviewed; for examples, electrolyte precursor composition, temperature and pH, electrode substrate, applied potential, deposition time as well as annealing temperature, duration and atmosphere.

Retrieved articles were systematically reviewed for inclusion criteria: 19 epidemiological studies (17 case-control and 2 cohort studies) fulfilled the inclusion criteria by estimating the crash risk associated with depression and/or psychotropic medications in naturalistic settings.

As part of the clinical trial governance and monitoring process, trial data is systematically reviewed for safety and progress towards primary endpoints by an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC).

Each transcript was systematically reviewed for themes.

All medicine text fields and text fields for dietary supplements/herbal remedies in the three questionnaires were systematically reviewed for herbal products by the research team (see also acknowledgement).

From the responders who fulfilled at least one pregnancy after the diagnosis of Crohn's disease, and who gave their informed consent, the medical records were systematically reviewed for objective details of IBD.

In conclusion, where thick slice contrast enhanced CT of the chest is employed in the management of any patient, but especially cancer patients, the pulmonary arterial tree should be systematically reviewed for incidental PE.

Our finding that the trial evidence for the effectiveness and safety of 65% of drugs has not been systematically reviewed suggests an urgent need for prioritising reviews for these drugs.

The MCID for interventions in dementia has been systematically reviewed elsewhere.