Sentence examples for been systematically compared in from inspiring English sources

The performance of monitoring systems, based on impulse-radar sensors and depth sensors, has been systematically compared in a series of experiments which involved the estimation of several quantities, carrying information important for medical and healthcare services, on the basis of data from those sensors.

The accuracy of these devices for PAC-derived CO measures has not been systematically compared in response to therapies other than volume resuscitation [ 11, 12].

However, global cardiac mechanical and metabolic effects of these induction agents in septic cardiomyopathy have thus far not been systematically compared in a dose-dependent fashion.

Optimised matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation (MALDI) and electrospray ionisation (ESI) mass spectrometry (MS) methodologies were systematically compared in terms of their relative abilities to identify distinct chemical species present in samples associated with a polymer mechanistic study.

In this study, TCDD-elicited temporal gene expression effects were systematically compared in order to assess the ability of Hepa1c1c7 cells to replicate C57BL/6 hepatic tissue responses.

The implementation of evidence-based national guidance on VTE prevention across two specialities (general medicine and orthopaedics) were systematically compared in four hospitals in 2009 and re-assessed for 2010.

However, these approaches have not been systematically compared with each other in the context of a controlled simulation study in which the true set of expressed transcripts and their expression levels are known, nor have they been compared with annotation-based inference under a range of assumptions about the accuracy of the annotations.

Most widely used protocols were developed to characterize microbiota of other habitats (i.e., gastrointestinal) and have not been systematically compared for their utility in skin microbiome surveys.

These have already been systematically compared and their advantages and limitations outlined in Carrara et al. 1999, Huabin et al. 2005 and van Westen et al. 2008.

Finally, quantitative-PCR plus next-generation sequencing methodologies have not as yet been systematically compared to TU-counting plus Sanger sequencing in terms of speed, cost, and, most importantly, accuracy.

The methods have many common features and have received significant attention in recent literature, yet have not been systematically compared.