Among all the plots that were obtained, only a few are shown as representative in Figs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, and 12.
Data are shown as representative experiments or as mean ± SEM.
All experiments were performed in triplicate, and data are shown as representative results.
T1D and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are shown as representative autoimmune and metabolic diseases.
The results with LNT are shown as representative of the entire effort.
Such a dataset was shown as representative of PubMed activity in our analysis.
Reduced binding was detected for a subset of target genes: Ankle2, Nme6, and Mrps5 are shown as representative examples.
However, because of interindividual variation, data in Figures 1 and 2 are shown as representative means (±SD) from single patient cell cultures.
Tissue concentrations, however, were the same (Figs. 1C and D; liver is shown as representative for soft tissues; 0.55 ± 0.53 µg Si/g vs. 0.50 ± 0.47 µg Si/g in the Si-deprived vs. Si-supplemented group).
But for reasons of clarity the tibial plateau is shown as representative for both cartilage and bone parameters, since this surface was not surgically damaged when osteoarthritis was induced in the groove model, making comparison with the ACLT model the most sound.
