Sentence examples for been published for only from inspiring English sources

Although the blueprints had been published for only a couple of days before the removal notice was issued late Thursday, it was too late.

However, the genome of S. rolfsii has not been sequenced yet and DNA sequences have been published for only a few S. rolfsii genes.

Thus far, genome-scale reconstructions have been published for only one photosynthetic microbe, the oxygenic cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [ 12- 14].

However, results have been published for only 2 of these mainly short-term studies, although half of the trials commenced at least 3 years ago.

Nuclear DNA content data have been published for only one species of the Colaconematales, Colaconema daviesii, with 2C DNA = 0.6 pg, and are limited to two species of Audouinella in the Acrochaetiales [see Additional Information].

To date, complete mitochondrial genomes have been published for only three species in the phylum, Cephalothrix hongkongiensis (Palaeonemertea) [reported as Cephalothrix simula in [ 6]], Lineus viridis (Heteronemertea) [ 7], and Paranemertes cf. peregrina (Hoplonemertea)[ 8].

Though the regional cancer registration was being operated in 16 prefectures in Japan as of 1976, the incidence rates were published for only six prefectures.

For example, one of us (JK) and co-workers recently looked at drugs that reached phase 3 trials but were never successfully licensed; results were published for only 37% of trials for these failed drugs (Hakala et al., 2015).

13 The most important contrast between these datasets taken from either end of the 20th century is that the 2001 data are available for 8850 census area statistics wards while the 1900s data were published for only 634 registration districts (excluding the Isles of Scilly).

To date, less than 205 microsatellite (SSR) markers have been published for grasspea, and only 61 of them were characterized for size polymorphism [ 7- 9].

Medical Hypotheses has been published for 35 years, but Charlton was only its second editor; he took over in 2003, hand-picked by founding editor David Horrobin, an eccentric scientist and entrepreneur who started the journal because he strongly believed that peer review stands in the way of innovation and creativity in science.