Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Infants who were formula fed were more likely to have been introduced to solid foods early [OR = 2.54 (95%CI 1.26, 5.13), P = 0.009] and this finding was independent of the age of the infant.
At week 16, 330 infants (7%) had been introduced to solid food; 2923 (65%) were introduced to solid food between week 17 25, and 1250 (28%) later than week 25.
Among infant factors infant boys and infants with high birth weight and early rapid weight gain are more likely to have been introduced to solid food during the first four months [ 5].
Similar(57)
A total of 32.5% of infants had already started on solids by the time of the assessment, and of these infants, 24% had been introduced to solids before 4 months of age.
Since he was introduced to solid food only three months ago, Metages eats exclusively porridge.
Girls were introduced to solid food later than boys and increased gestational age at birth and high birth weight were associated with earlier introduction of solid food.
The majority of Danish infants were introduced to solid food between four and six months and only a small proportion was introduced before four months.
Studies in which infants were introduced to solid foods at ages younger than 4 months or greater than 6 months of age were also excluded.
The majority of Danish infants were introduced to solid food between four and six months after birth; only a small proportion was introduced before four months and approximately one third after six months of age.
A UK longitudinal cohort study found that infants fed with formula milk were introduced to solid foods earlier than breast fed infants and were less likely to have consumed fruit and vegetables[ 9].
The finding that the impact of the mother's perception of infant cues on earlier introduction to solid food was related to a lower birth weight of the baby corresponds to earlier findings by Boyington et al. [ 35]; they found that infants perceived as small were introduced to solid foods earlier.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com