Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(1)
Provided that mismatch strain is ruled out, which is often ascribed as the cause for 3D growth in the case of heteroepitaxial systems, the origin of this type of nanostructures in homoepitaxy has been generally explained in terms of anisotropic surface fluxes caused, for instance, by step edge barriers [6, 7].
Similar(59)
Field emission (FE) phenomena are generally explained in the frame-work of Fowler Nordheim (FN) theory which was given for flat metal surfaces.
Mutations were generally explained in terms of their functional consequences, although these explanations are not necessarily definitive and some will require experimental validation.
Indeed, the classical psychophysical picture of fine spatial resolution for touch on the fingertips and for vision in the fovea is generally explained in terms of peripheral innervation density and receptive field size [ 16].
Differences among farms belonging to different economic sizes and PSE levels can be generally explained by differences in terms of the relative importance of the three income sources.
This can be generally explained by differences in infectivity, viral doubling time, and minimum infectious dose.
The results of these studies have provided experimental evidence to substantiate or revise numerous theories of evolution [ 1, 2]; the evolutionary mechanisms were generally explained by changes in DNA sequences and/or some particular genes [ 3– 6].
Male-biased size dimorphism (MSD) is generally explained by size advantage in male male competition for mates, and it is often associated with highly polygynous species that exhibit skewed male reproductive success (Le Boeuf and Reiter 1988; Boness et al. 1993; Andersson 1994).
Heterogeneity is generally explained at three different levels in the biological universe: first, there is heterogeneity in different organisms; second, there is heterogeneity in different organs or tissues from an organism; third, cellular heterogeneity exists in the same organ or tissue.
Gender differences in endurance performance are generally explained by a lower percentage of body fat and higher VO2max in men (Calbet and Joyner 2010; Joyner 1993), amongst others.
Though suspicions were aroused when other labs could not duplicate them, these suspicions were generally explained as the result of differences in equipment.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com