However, such findings (the non-superiority of US vs clinical examination) might also be explained by the difficulty of US examination justifying the current efforts to improve the training of ultrasonographers in this area.
Taking this view of what is explained by statistical theories allows us to avoid various unintuitive consequences of Hempel's model (e.g., that high probability but not low probability outcomes are explained) and of Salmon's model (e.g., the same explanans $E$ explains both $M$ and $-M$.
Hey, maybe all of this intransigence can't be explained by bank lobbyists influencing US Senators.
However, the apparently more ordered concentrations of word multiplicities, around the modes, can be explained by considering that frequencies allow us to classify (and count) words corresponding to the same multiset (Parikh vector equivalent).
Because the ISI Web of Knowledge only indexes the most important (and established) journals in each field, it is unlikely that these findings can be explained by differential availability (e.g., that US based authors are more likely to publish in US journals that are more likely to be available in US university libraries).
This difference might be explained by a possible 'ceiling effect' in US-based studies, i.e. a substantial proportion of detox patients in the United States may have stronger intentions to attend TSGs regardless of whether or not they receive specific motivational interventions 29.
Part of that might be explained by our existential condition: most of us feel that we have a core self, separate and separable from our body, and most of us find it hard to accept that we will someday cease to exist.
Our more extensive findings are likely to be explained by our recruitment criteria that allowed us to explore reasons for non-participation in screening among participants who had been invited to the NHS BCSP on more than one occasion.
