Ai Feedback
Exact(5)
It has been corrected here to 4.0.
This statement has been corrected here to indicate that "only tuna fillets had > 2 ppm mercury".
They have been corrected here to 0.8 1.1%, 1.5%, and 4.0%, respectively.
In the manuscript originally published online, the number of eligible participants (32,705) was incorrect; it has been corrected here to 30,655.
The "Demographic and Asthma Characteristics of Cohort" section of "Results" in the manuscript originally published online was incorrect in describing less than two-thirds and 15% of the cohort; it has been corrected here to fewer than one-half and 30%.
Similar(54)
The range of PAH per milliliter of BEGM (9 × 10 to 9 × 10 ng PAH/mL BEGM) in the "Discussion" of the manuscript originally published online was incorrect; it has been corrected here (1 × 10 to 1 × 10 ng PAH/mL BEGM).
Different staining procedures could lead to slight differences in tissue shrinkage (that has not been corrected here).
This has been corrected here.
This has been corrected here and in the original article.
These have been corrected here.
It has been corrected here.
Related(20)
been simplified here to
been extended here to
been proven here to
been remixed here to
been shown here to
been implemented here to
been employed here to
been started here to
been given here to
been called here to
been used here to
been performed here to
been brought here to
been made here to
been enhanced here to
been put here to
been proposed here to
been found here to
been done here to
been explained here to
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com