Similarly, to avoid these errors, the location of abnormal visual field points should be compared to regions of abnormal RGC+ and RNFL thickness.
These women will be compared to women who received an abnormal Pap smear at the same clinics between 180 and 90 days prior to the start of the study when no navigator calls were made (control population) as determined by medical records.
Abnormal patients were compared to the normal patients; thus, multiple tests were performed.
The results are compared to the nucleation and growth of abnormal grains in BaTiO3.
It could be that the accuracy of texture analysis based on non-contrast enhanced CT scan is lower than PET texture or that there was indeed a true difference between CT and PET textures when abnormal tissues are compared to the normal tissues.
For completeness, the odds in favor of not developing pneumonia among the patients who had an abnormal RCT were compared to the odds in favor of not developing pneumonia among the patients who had a normal RCT.
In contrast, in our prior work we showed that when Osteogenesis imperfecta (a connective tissue disorder arising from abnormal collagen) skin was compared to the normal, a different set of parameters was found to differentiate them[ 19].
The number of nuclei with abnormal orientation (negative angle), was compared to the total number of cells and this ratio was used for analysis of contralateral orientation.
Women with abnormal follow-up smears were compared to those with normal smears.
Using logistic regression, individuals with an abnormal lung capacity result were compared to individuals with normal lung capacity results.
