Sentence examples for been argued that screening from inspiring English sources

It has been argued that screening from age 20 could prevent more cancers in women aged 25-34 than screening from age 25.

On the other hand, it has been argued that screening should not be implemented, as the true benefit of screening and subsequent treatment of psychological distress is far from being definitively proven (Coyne, 2013).

It has been argued that screening begins to be fully effective only once a woman has been screened twice and that consequently women screened aged 20-24 againgatn ageage 25 will have a greater benefit from screening after age 25 than will those who are first screened at age 25.

Although breast cancer mammography screening programmes are widely used and often age-based, the efficiency of screening programmes is still debated, and it has been argued that individualised screening programmes are needed to reduce overdiagnosis and overtreatment [ 27].

This finding is in accord with views reported elsewhere, where it has been argued that mass screening and treatment of all affected individuals at regular intervals is the most appropriate intervention [4], [14].

It has been argued that a tiered screening system which accepts higher false positive rates is a preferred option [ 17, 18].

15 16 However, in the context of a growing international movement towards policies promoting greater involvement of patients and citizens in health decision-making 17 20 it has been argued that people offered screening should have the opportunity to make informed decisions about whether to participate.

On the one hand, it has been argued that those attending for screening are particularly susceptible to smoking cessation interventions [ 71].

It is difficult to compare this finding with the women's health initiative, particularly as it has been argued that the single question screen for sexual satisfaction used in the women's health initiative was inadequate.

It has been argued that high attendance rates in trials of screening for colorectal cancer in Norway may be cultural and not easily comparable to other countries.

For example, it has been argued that the mutations identified in forward genetic screens in zebrafish and medaka are biased.