Sentence examples for bed p from inspiring English sources

There were significant increases in both objective total sleep time (P < 0.05, Friedman test), subjective time in bed (P < 0.05, Friedman test), and subjective sleep quality (P < 0.05, Friedman test), although these occurred in both arms.

where φ sat is the friction angle of the saturation bed; P e is the excess pore water pressure generated by the moving mass flow on top of the bed deposits.

NSM patients spent more time in bed (p = 0.041), had more stage N3 slow-wave sleep (p = 0.009) and a lower index of fast arousals (p = 0.041) than controls.

A study of over 55,000 ED patients demonstrated a higher mortality rate among patients boarded in the ED than in those moved to an inpatient hallway bed (p < 0.05).

During the HIVNET 012 follow-up study, there was no difference in normalized optical density values (OD-n) obtained with the BED assay or in the avidity test results when women were pregnant (n = 20 results) compared to those obtained when women were not pregnant (n = 115; for BED: p = 0.9, generalized estimating equations model; for avidity: p = 0.7, Wilcoxon rank sum).

Mean LIAP was 9.2 mmHg when supine and increased to 9.6 mmHg with 30° head of bed (p < 0.001).

After separation, older calves stood and moved more (p < 0.001), placed their heads outside the pen more often (p < 0.01) and showed more explorative behaviour (i.e. sniffing walls and bedding, p < 0.01; licking walls, p < 0.05) than the calves separated on day 1.

At hospital level, there was no association between mortality and critical care admission directly after surgery (p = 0.26), critical care admission to treat complications (p = 0.33), or provision of critical care beds (p = 0.70).

We repeated these analyses after stratification according to baseline performance level.Compared with nonparticipating hospitals, those participating were larger (median 288 vs 139 beds, P <.0001), more often teaching hospitals (18.8% vs 6.3%, P <.0001), and more likely had interventional catheterization lab capabilities (85.7% vs 34.0%, P <.0001).

The difference was statistically significant in the group recorded on the mother's bedding (p = 0.006), borderline in the clean bedding group (p = 0.046), but not significant in the stranger's bedding (p = 0.12) (Figure 7A).

Similarly, two-way ANOVA did not reveal significant interaction between genotype and bedding (p = 0.15), and genotype and day (p = 0.29).