Sentence examples for because we cannot rule from inspiring English sources

To prevent/mitigate the next disaster, it is vital to continuously monitor the slip gap because we cannot rule out a possibility of an impending seismic event.

And the examination of our beliefs is guided by reflection on hypothetical possibilities: we cannot trust our perceptual beliefs, for example, because we cannot rule out the possibility that they are produced by a dream or by wicked scientists manipulating our brains.

Although the results suggest that the country of destination matters (only when most emigrants settled in developed countries, prominently the U.S., were trans-border conversations significant) this finding is tentative because we cannot rule out that the characteristics of those who emigrate to advanced vs. developing countries are driving this finding.

"Because we cannot rule out the possibility of conducting the primary before the end of this year, we are, regrettably, as we were four years ago, forced to move the candidates filing period to October," Gardner said in the statement posted on his office's website.

There may therefore be a bias in the results, because we cannot rule out the possibility that strains capable of infecting humans constitute an unusual subpopulation.

Because we cannot rule out this possible confound of microsaccades, it might seem that the present dataset should be recollected with an fMRI eyetracker that has a high enough temporal and spatial resolution to permit detection of microsaccades.

Therefore, any association reported in the present study should be interpreted with great caution, because without rigorous replication we cannot rule out the possibility that these findings are only due to chance.

We think that the CED-9 background staining in the nuclear fraction of the cell fractionation experiment is likely because of imperfect fractionation, but we cannot rule out that some CED-9 not detectable by cytology might be associated with the nucleus.

However, even if we would have used a totally age-matched control subjects, our results would have been with even higher significance, because in this control group we cannot rule out a possibility that some of the younger control subjects may develop prostate cancer later in their life.

Because this study is cross-sectional, we cannot rule out reverse causality as an explanation for the observed associations.

We could not explore the role of lack of blinding separately from malfunctioning systems because of overlap between studies; therefore, we cannot rule out recall bias.