Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
Our results should be interpreted with caution because this study had several limitations including its retrospective design and patients from a single institution, which could have selection biases.
Because this study had a cross-sectional design, it was difficult to elucidate definite relationships between seroprevalence and each risk or protective factor.
Because this study had an exploratory character and the limited sample size did not allow multivariate analyses, subsequent studies are needed to confirm the findings.
Because this study had not the intention to determine an exact cardiovascular risk profile, a complete lipid profile was not considered in this study.
However, more detailed and larger studies are necessary to make confident conclusions, because this study had a relatively small (n = 38) and nonrandom study population (pTis only).
However, because this study had no replication cohort and previous European studies have not reported the association for HLA-C amino-acid position 116, this association needs to be validated in an independent cohort in the future.
Similar(50)
This study had limitations because of the cross-sectional study design.
This is because this study has focused on carbonate source-rock samples while the relationship reported by Hakami et al. (2016) was developed for a carbonate source-rock reservoir in Saudi Arabia.
Because this study has several limitations, data interpretation requires caution.
Because this study has its focus on technical and conceptual development, it has several limitations.
Here we report results using data from Singh's study because this study has relatively large sample size (50 normal and 52 tumor samples).
More suggestions(17)
because this study achieved
because this area had
because this artist had
because this study did
because this system had
because this celebrity had
because this study asked
because this study used
because this study dealt
because this person had
because this team had
because this miRNA had
because this boss had
because this scenario had
because this country had
because this project had
because this adjustment had
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com