Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
Because this review includes trials that did not have a placebo comparator, information on adverse events was available from many more patients.
Similar(59)
Because this review included nine studies with limited information of study methods, we were limited in our ability to draw conclusions regarding level of bias in several domains.
The more inclusive term is used here because the data used in this review included all forms of municipal sewage sludge and because PCDD/F content is not affected by the additional treatment processes.
This review included 13 articles.
This review included ten studies.
This review included 123 studies.
However, because the review included both ante- and intrapartum care models, the results are not obviously comparable with the results in the present study.
This is because these reviews included Donzelli et al. (2006) [ 27], a parallel case series article.
This may be because the previous review included patients "at risk" of HIV, as well as those known to be infected with HIV in the risk group.
This systematic review included 39 papers.
I've had the LG G3 for a month now and I want to point this out because most reviews - including many of the ones I write - are penned after significantly less time using a handset.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com