Sentence examples for because they were subsequently from inspiring English sources

A total of 21 were excluded from participation (1) because they or their legal decision-maker declined to participate, (2) due to systemic or laboratory abnormalities that interfered with their participation or (3) because they were subsequently found to have missing data (VAS not recorded or incomplete vital signs on scheduled measurements).

694 patients were excluded because they were subsequently referred to a hospital department and tested for intrathecal antibody production.

Of these, 3 ACM+HT and 2 CC participants were excluded because they were subsequently found to meet baseline exclusion criteria; 2 CC participants withdrew before the initial education session and 6 ACM+HT participants withdrew afterward.

And no emergency appears to warrant swift amendments to wiretapping laws, which are unrelated to the ruling from Luxembourg.New surveillance rules deserve careful consideration, argues Paul Bernal of the University of East Anglia not least because they are subsequently interpreted and exercised in secret.

It is important to reduce the number of errors in chromosome prints to a minimum because they are subsequently used for error detection and identification and removal of uninformative markers.

Milnacipran users were initially considered, but they were subsequently excluded because of the small number of patients taking milnacipran (less than 0.5% of all subjects).

Of these, 2 combinations were subsequently removed because they were not sufficiently variable among our full set of gulls.

Eight cases and nine controls were subsequently excluded because they were postmenopausal, resulting in 288 cases and 350 controls for this analysis.

Of these, 572 were eligible and 516 agreed to participate (recruitment rate of 90%), although 17 boys were subsequently excluded because they were orphans (precluding collection of residential history and other information).

These papers were obtained and reviewed but nearly half (n = 29) were subsequently excluded because they were: review articles, editorials or letters (n = 15); cost analyses with no details on effects (n = 7); or cost-outcome analyses and hence not full economic evaluations (n = 7) [ 12].

However, 27 were subsequently excluded because they were outside the specified age range (3), reported previous carpal tunnel surgery (7), had not experienced recent sensory symptoms in either hand (4) or had no satisfactory nerve conduction measurements in either hand (13).